Techné AI
Corrections.
This page lists every substantive correction to published Techné AI work: what the document said, what it says now, and when it changed. It exists because a research service that promises verification should show its errors, not bury them in silent edits.
A short log is not a claim of near-perfection — it is a young log, opened July 2026. It will grow, and that is how it should work.
The policy
Class 1 — Material error. A misstated authority, statistic, statute number, or legal status that could change a reader's action. Corrected within 48 hours of discovery, logged here, and — where the document is a subscriber playbook, template, or tracker — notified to subscribers by email.
Class 2 — Substantive imprecision. Accurate but overclaimed, stale-dated, or missing a limitation that matters. Corrected in the next maintenance cycle or sooner, and logged here.
Class 3 — Editorial. Typography, formatting, phrasing. Fixed in place and noted in the document's own change log; not listed here.
No substantive language is ever rewritten without a change-log entry on the document itself.
The log
All corrections, newest first.
| Date | Library | Document | Class | What was wrong | What it now says |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Firm-wide | Homepage regulatory update | Class 2 · Substantive | The homepage said the EU Omnibus awaited publication and changed only the calendar; Colorado was described as a disclosure-only replacement. Illinois notice proposals were not clearly distinguished from adopted requirements. | The September source update links the enacted EU amendment, Colorado enacted-bill summary and June 26 Illinois withdrawal. It distinguishes statutory duties from proposed procedures. This correction covers the named web surfaces; older PDFs have not all been revised. |
| 2026-09-04 | TalentSight | Sales-page product inventory | Class 1 · Material | The offer described a national tracker and multiple interactive tools as available, although those deliverables were absent from the published library. | The page lists the published Illinois documents and actual formats, removes unavailable deliverables and explains manual activation of additional organization seats. |
| 2026-09-04 | TalentSight | Vendor response tracker and notice templates | Class 2 · Substantive | Several tracker question labels did not match the questionnaire. Notice copy treated proposed timing as a hard rule, and published templates retained draft footers. | The September note identifies the tracker numbering corrections. Portal notice wording distinguishes operating recommendations from adopted rules. Published template footers reflect publication; dated PDF replacement remains pending. |
| 2026-07-12 | TalentSight | Illinois penalty figures (third tier) | Class 1 · Material | The third-tier penalty lookback was stated as 5 years. | The third-and-subsequent-violation cap of $70,000 applies where there were prior adjudged violations within 7 years (not 5). Corrected by the firm’s verification pass before publication. |
| 2026-07-12 | TalentSight | Illinois coverage description | Class 2 · Substantive | Copy implied an out-of-state employer is covered by the Illinois Human Rights Act merely by screening Illinois applicants. | The Act covers employers with one or more employees in Illinois; an out-of-state employer is reached through having an Illinois-based employee, not by applicant screening alone. |
| 2026-07-02 | TalentSight | Illinois penalty figures (v1 toolkit and any asset citing them) | Class 1 · Material | A civil-penalty figure was stated as $38,000. | The Illinois Human Rights Act second-violation civil penalty is capped at $42,500 (prior adjudged violation within 5 years); penalties are assessed per act and per aggrieved party. Corrected before the library published. |
We publish every material correction with its date. Two of the entries above were caught by our own verification process before the affected document reached a subscriber; we log them anyway. A maintained library is only as trustworthy as its willingness to show its work.
Report an error
If you believe something we published is wrong, write to info@techne.ai with the document name and the claim. Reports are reviewed under the policy above, and material reports are acknowledged.